Search:

Originally Posted by Makaze 1599264447 (#3258)

@Athena_57 even

Let's just tag @Architect Athena while we're at it.

Good eye on calling me out, @Chelsea

Originally Posted by Makaze 1599262628 (#3244)

##Vote Psycho666Soldier

Good game.

##Vote Psycho666Soldier

Originally Posted by Makaze 1599261068 (#3232)

Originally Posted by jumpluff 1599215986 (#3188)

My internet is in and out due to storms rn so I’m on my phone

Ty for the script I’ve been spoiled by MU

There’s not a whole lot I can add from here; the things you’ve said are the major points against Psycho here. Either way Chelsea is a cornered wolf who has to hope her partner can win f3 is my interpretation. F5 play has been noted.

I can’t work with v!Chelsea as a possibility realistically any more. I did consider that she might not want voting to begin until she can argue convincingly as a villager intending to vote ria and fearing hasty votes but it feels severely out of character and she just isn’t a villager as far as I can see

If we can enforce a voting order that might be good but I sense we’ll struggle to implement it with peoples schedules and disagreements

Would want something like

Chelsea > you / Psycho > Logic / me (Logic is busy and I’m not sure how free during the day he is; I would be on late only)

/ can be >

@Logic

Oh that's a fine Order. I'd prefer Jump and psycho trade places, but I am leaning that Jump is more likely town than anyone but psycho.

Originally Posted by Logic 1599261616 (#3236)

Originally Posted by Chelsea 1599261212 (#3234)

@Makaze If I was voting purely based on the 5 players here I'd say Psycho/Logic 8/10 times here but that would mean PB did certain things as a wolf that I just can't respect and I hold PB to a higher standard than that so it's hard.

I plan to vote Psycho in the next hour

I haven't read anything by my previous slot occupant, but can you clarify what you mean by the bolded?

Especially seeing how this isn't the first time you've said almost word for word this same phrase.

Originally Posted by Chelsea 1599261212 (#3234)

@Makaze If I was voting purely based on the 5 players here I'd say Psycho/Logic 8/10 times here but that would mean PB did certain things as a wolf that I just can't respect and I hold PB to a higher standard than that so it's hard.

I plan to vote Psycho in the next hour

I haven't read anything by my previous slot occupant, but can you clarify what you mean by the bolded?

Ugh. I just lost a small wallpost.

Short version: @Makaze I didn't see a vote order from jump, except maybe the "chelsea will vote psycho no mater what we want" in P#3130 (I don't think this counts as a vote order) but I don't have motivation to read Jump's Great Wallposts right now to see if you are talking about something else.

Thankfully you guys haven't put me in a deciding position yet.

I'm very slowly catching up and reading (though I feel like I'm not retaining anything) mostly because I was dumb and played pokemon overnight instead of catching up when I had the chance.

My best guess for a wolf is Chelsea, and my best guess for a town is in psycho.

From what I read of sully, I did not like it: it looked scummy. But jump looks decent.

Mak is a big ol' pile of ??? and I suspect I need to do some vca deep dives to read them.

Originally Posted by Psycho666Soldier 1599179361 (#3121)

I didn't get the chance read much over night other than some of woopons' d5 posts. At the moment, I'm pretty dead set on Mak/Chelsea after that EOD, and I will be casting my vote within the first 24 hours.

Please don't.
I don't have a bunch of time to reread right this moment and would prefer to have more analysis than come in and have the pressure to be some kind of deciding vote.

Originally Posted by Chelsea 1599091210 (#3104)

I pray that my reads are bad

Why would you want your reads to be bad?

##Vote primordial woopons

This is the least townie looking off of live posting.

Of the three wagons, I am currently not considering Psycho.

Originally Posted by Chelsea 1599090856 (#3081)

typed outg Logic is Psycho's partner and then I remembered that was PB and slammed my head on my desk sigh

This...
Is slightly townie.

Originally Posted by jumpluff 1599090483 (#3066)

Originally Posted by Logic 1599090372 (#3061)

I think I vote for woopans here over psycho, and I am basing that solely off thread consensus and that woopans has yet to self pres. Plus I kinda like how psycho is talking about mak here.

Do you agree with it, or do you just like the reasoning Psycho is showing?

One reason I asked you to specifically ISO Makaze when you get a chance is for additional perspective on Makaze for me and because I think you probably have more compatibility with Makaze as a thinker than me

Makaze is a robot.
I'm just kinda good at pretending to be one (sometimes)

Mak is someone I intend to ISO, and because of the back and forth I saw between mak and Psycho, I've got better feelings about psycho than mak, but I'm leaning that pair is t/t.

Additionally, I saw psycho try to engage me with a ping earlier, which is a better sign of town than scum, unless he's trying to pocket someone that simply isn't here.

Regarding Chelsea, I read their first (10?) Posts and don't like them. I do t know if I have the time to go into further analysis, but I may sheep psycho here.

Someone want to give me a reason why not to?

I think I vote for woopans here over psycho, and I am basing that solely off thread consensus and that woopans has yet to self pres. Plus I kinda like how psycho is talking about mak here.

Originally Posted by Logic 1599088927 (#3023)

Originally Posted by Psycho666Soldier 1599088581 (#3015)

Originally Posted by Makaze 1599088102 (#3008)

Originally Posted by primordial woopons 1599087451 (#3002)

The idea that Claire/Makaze would have more control now I think is what has to give wrt the remaining associatives.

@Makaze please tell me precisely how my thought dump “does not make sense” and “is full of contradictions”. Why does town!Makaze here not even make the effort to entertain how there is a consistent thought process to the posts

I don't have time to do an iso
This goes for @Psycho666Soldier too, I've been pushing my breaks well over 15 as it is, I see what I see
I have an example in my recent post where your argument poe don't make sense

I'm just saying it's hilariously hypocritical.

Can I get a little more context as to what is hypocritical?
Are you talking about mak or woop here?

Nevermind. I think you answered this now.

Originally Posted by Psycho666Soldier 1599088581 (#3015)

Originally Posted by Makaze 1599088102 (#3008)

Originally Posted by primordial woopons 1599087451 (#3002)

The idea that Claire/Makaze would have more control now I think is what has to give wrt the remaining associatives.

@Makaze please tell me precisely how my thought dump “does not make sense” and “is full of contradictions”. Why does town!Makaze here not even make the effort to entertain how there is a consistent thought process to the posts

I don't have time to do an iso
This goes for @Psycho666Soldier too, I've been pushing my breaks well over 15 as it is, I see what I see
I have an example in my recent post where your argument poe don't make sense

I'm just saying it's hilariously hypocritical.

Can I get a little more context as to what is hypocritical?
Are you talking about mak or woop here?

I want to apologize for my absence: the past few days I've been dealing with personal issues, so I did not get around to any ISOs.

Originally Posted by Logic 1599001242 (#2743)

Someone give me an ISO target.

I guess I'll start with ISOing the Psycho slot and Mak.

Someone give me an ISO target.

From what little I've gathered of this Psycho/Mak interaction, I'd say the only world I can rule out is w/w.

Originally Posted by Psycho666Soldier 1598940334 (#2607)

Current POE: Logic, Supa, Chelsea

At least 1 wolf in there

I can't tell if this is towny for going against consensus or scummy for opening up the POE.

Reporting in that I am an American about to go to bed.
I'll put in some work on this tomorrow as I have read absolutely nothing this far.