
Originally Posted by
Ampharos
1598261935
(
#1410)
@
SullyMcGully elaborate on not being particularly impressed by my content
It's not that it's particularly scummy, it's just that it... isn't worded very well. You (and this could be said of Ria too) tend to write in large paragraphs that can address multiple different points and lack good sentence order, which means that I have to reread them several times to figure out what they're saying. And so far, in this game, I haven't really had time to read anyone's posts more than once (with the exception of the YOLO ISO I did recently.)
But your voting history sends a pretty clear message without me having to understand the accompanying reads. The Athena push would be really hard for scum to justify.
I'm just worried because of SFMM5. In that game, Zoey and I were town leader. We allowed you into our inner circle and made you aware of our plans for all of town's power roles. When mafia completely screwed up on N1, I figured it cleared you, because you knew who was getting docced/copped/etc and you could have done something about it if you were scum. You were my top townread for the rest of the game. Little did I know that the reason scum didn't get a successful kill N1 was because you were overworked IRL and never actually got the chance to tell your buddies who not to shoot.
So basically, I kinda do have this impression of you as someone who
might do something that makes no sense as scum and basically townclears you at the start of the game just to make the rest of the game a walk in the park.
I mean, I did this myself in a recent scumgame. I bussed all three of my buddies in the first three day phases to gain as much towncred as I could. I didn't really have much of a choice, as they were all way too low-effort for me to protect. And yeah, I did get misyeeted on the fourth day phase... but that's because I'm terrible. I'm sure you could pull it off.
Don't let the fact that I made six paragraphs about this make you think you're a top scumread for me, though. There are definitely worse-looking players on the list. I just don't think it's impossible for you to be scum just because you got Athena yeeted.

Originally Posted by
Chelsea
1598289180
(
#1458)
Anyone who isn't in the top/bottom row may ask for why a read is placed their excluding themselves and I will happily enlighten you when I'm back from my break. Carry on little mice.
I kinda want to be "enlightened," but judging from your interactions with Supa, I'd just get a bunch of raw condescension with hardly any logic I can reply to.
Also, if you're scumreading someone, shouldn't you explain your reasoning to town regardless of whether that someone wants you to or not? This is just lazy. If you think me or Weapons are likely scum, you should say why so that information is out in the open. You shouldn't just throw out a vague "I'm sussing you!" and then say "I'll only tell you why if you ask politely though." Like, why should scum care if you're scumreading them? The purpose of a case is not to tell scumreads why they're suspicious, it's to tell town why you think scumreads are scum.
There's no town benefit in doing the above. It doesn't even put any real pressure on the players in question. The only reason I can see you doing it is as scum, hoping nobody questions you about your lack of reads and trying to make players you know are town paranoid for no reason.

Originally Posted by
Makaze
1598289605
(
#1462)

Originally Posted by
supa2
1598288937
(
#1457)
Woopons reveals himself over time just like Dunn did when nobody CC'd him. That's a lot of noise just for trying to lynch Dunn. I think the EoD looks good for woopons because you had a bunch of people who realized Woopons was just doing woopons and wasn't being serious. I think if Woopons had a team they could could string together that Woopons meant his claim (I wasn't sure about the timing of everything) for real and even if Dunn died then he did them a solid getting him killed. It's not like anyone would blame those for believing woopons it'd just be like 'ah man I guess he owned us'
I'm seriously worried about that because this is exactly what I did in Zelda mafia and it cleared me to endgame
Makaze, Makaze, Makaze. I get that you've done the whole fakeclaim thing as scum before. And I get that you're worried. But I also can't really think of two playstyles that have less in common than yours and Weapon's. You're completely different players, so for me "Makaze did this once" doesn't really translate to "Weapons does this also."

Originally Posted by
Bartozio
1598292723
(
#1470)

Originally Posted by
Makaze
1598290200
(
#1469)
I keep thinking about it but no matter how much WIFOM I have I don't get why woopons CC's or doesn't believe Dunn in the first place given he's fakeclaiming.
Confuse the scumteam into not shooting Dunn asap? That's what I thought Woopons was doing, but maybe I give him too much credit.
I actually thought about this. I wondered whether it townspewed Weapons that scum didn't shoot Dunn last night. If Weapons was scum, then they would know that Dunn was the real doc.
But I decided against it. I mean, even if they hadn't known which one was the real doc, it still would have been optimal to shoot one or the other. The fact that they didn't is bizarre.
Also Weapons cut it really close. He almost actually got Dunn yeeted. That doesn't seem like someone trying to keep Dunn alive. Not unless there are some big brain plays going on here, and I honestly don't get that vibe from Weapons.