Search:

Type: Posts; User: Makaze

Page 1 of 60 1 2 3 4

Search: Search took 0.14 seconds.

  1. Replies
    29
    Views
    502

    https://raw.githubusercontent.com/kaasbaardje/bloc...

    Quote Originally Posted by Apoc (#23)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#22)
    If it gets abused for spam we will add the footers back. No big deal.
    And then when people complain about the footers you will take them out again

    And round and round we go
  2. Replies
    72
    Views
    2,632

    Done.

  3. Replies
    29
    Views
    502

    Many people have critiqued the footers for a long...

    Quote Originally Posted by mendel (#21)
    Quote Originally Posted by Contrainer (#20)
    Yeah this could be bad. People could be like "oh PlayerA maxed out their postcount. @PlayerA Is PlayerB scum? Post a VC for Yes."

    Just unsigned them imo
    the solution that has already been implemented (as I understand it) is that postcapped players can no longer post vote counts
    so this is no longer possible

    if post counts are credited or not is therefore irrelevant for postcapped communication
    it won't work either way

    but being able to call up unattributed vote counts and potentially spam the thread with them, or send a message, is not good, even if the player is not postcapped
    therefore, all vote counts should be attributed
    Apoc and Phighter seem to agree
    Many people have critiqued the footers for a long time.

    If it gets abused for spam we will add the footers back. No big deal.
  4. Resolved There might be an issue with the search index...

    Quote Originally Posted by Apoc (#14)
    There is a separate issue (although maybe they are related?) that seems to cause posts to not appear in an ISO straight away, just takes a while for newer posts to appear in there...

    Not sure how long, maybe 15 to 30 minutes
    There might be an issue with the search index taking some time to update.

    What changed for rabbit just now was that over night I re-built the search index from scratch.
  5. Resolved Link me to a thread/player combo where this...

    Quote Originally Posted by iaafr (#9)
    i also have had issues with isos for awhile

    mainly the manual input page thing doesnt work and it also makes it impossible to navigate to the page you wanted to manually

    but if you dont try to navigate with the input feature, but just by clicking pages over and over, it works
    Link me to a thread/player combo where this happens so I can see for myself.
  6. Resolved If that feature produces an error, then so will...

    If that feature produces an error, then so will the last page button. It is not there because there are issues with the way searches are generated that prevent accurate estimation.
  7. Replies
    29
    Views
    502

    It did get abused in the finale.

    Quote Originally Posted by Apoc (#16)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#6)
    Does anyone else feel this is worth the time to code it?
    not really


    if someone was legitimately trying to angleshoot by bringing up retro votecounts then we have a bigger problem that how modbot handles votecounts

    I don't think the odd votecount here or there is an issue, besides...both alignments can do it.
    It did get abused in the finale.
  8. Resolved You can click on the "Page 1 of X" button and...

    Quote Originally Posted by roro__b (#1)
    As title says. QoL stuff when it comes to reading ISOs, maybe just adding << and >> would make it a lot easier to navigate.
    You can click on the "Page 1 of X" button and then enter the page you want to go, including X:

  9. Replies
    29
    Views
    502

    I like this, so I made it only show up on retro...

    Quote Originally Posted by mendel (#13)
    proxy voting should have a cooldown, else it beomces a communication channel as well

    I dislike removing attribution from post counts, if anything, retro counts should receive it, rather than current post counts lose it
    I don't think it fits with mafia philosphy that player can in effect post anonymously in daychat
    I like this, so I made it only show up on retro votecounts (just now).
  10. Replies
    29
    Views
    502

    Done.

  11. #3

    Thread: Database Query

    by Makaze
    Replies
    3
    Views
    78

    Where is the re-rand link? Automated games...

    Quote Originally Posted by El-ahrairah (#1)
    How often is the Database updated?

    I note that the results for the Poisonous Vigilantes game which had to end prematurely due to an error which caused roles to be revealed in modbot while the game was still on D1 is showing on my record as a 'Loss' even though it was terminated with neither side winning, and it showed up as that within minutes of the thread being locked. Yet the Re-rand of the game isn't even listed on my record despite it finishing last week: https://www.mafiauniverse.com/databa...profile/?id=38
    Where is the re-rand link?

    Automated games should be added automatically at the end of the game. They might not process if the game is forced to end by the host, I might have forgotten that logic.

    The database can be manually edited by anyone I give permissions to, but how often that happens depends on how much effort people put in.

    If you want permissions to fix this problem, I can give them; any help is appreciated.
  12. Replies
    29
    Views
    502

    Does anyone else feel this is worth the time to...

    Does anyone else feel this is worth the time to code it?
  13. Replies
    29
    Views
    502

    Anyone could call up a vote count or multiple...

    Quote Originally Posted by Secondhand Revenant (#3)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#2)
    Wouldn't it be better to just remove the credit footer from the posted vote counts?
    Well, you could specifically @ someone still and then they respond, or you could bring up retrospective vote counts you think are important, or you could just pull up the vote count to remind people at times you think it is important. If you really try you can attempt to make it influence something. (Or say you're the only one who has a limit, no one else claims to have called up the count). I mean, this is all fairly silly ideas and stuff, but I'm not sure there's much of a benefit anymore to letting someone post it when they can personally view it.
    Anyone could call up a vote count or multiple vote counts and there would be no way to verify who did what.
  14. Replies
    29
    Views
    502

    Wouldn't it be better to just remove the credit...

    Wouldn't it be better to just remove the credit footer from the posted vote counts?
  15. Replies
    952
    Views
    36,679

    Completed No problems.

    No problems.
  16. Replies
    952
    Views
    36,679

    Completed I min/maxed Stealth and Evasion. It paid off.

    Quote Originally Posted by LordQuas (#797)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#756)
    I like to think my stat choice/strategy was the most ridiculous and the most fun, to watch if nothing else!

    I had fun and would continue or play again.
    I min maxed stealth and search and like a few points I had in excess into one other stat

    I had 1 HP as well my dude, assuming we went similar directions
    I min/maxed Stealth and Evasion. It paid off.
  17. Replies
    952
    Views
    36,679

    Completed I like to think my stat choice/strategy was the...

    I like to think my stat choice/strategy was the most ridiculous and the most fun, to watch if nothing else!

    I had fun and would continue or play again.
  18. #3

    Thread: Open Signups

    by Makaze
    Replies
    11
    Views
    419

    For the last time, Zork, I will not take payment...

    For the last time, Zork, I will not take payment in exchange for game slots.

    You could always hold off on your game until you think the demand will be met instead of trying to restrict it so that people have no choice but to play yours.
  19. Replies
    62
    Views
    1,072

    I would like to say it again that we have a...

    I would like to say it again that we have a blacklist system that hosts can use for any reason. If you are that worried about potential subbing, you should do your own investigation and turn people down if you think they pose too great a risk. If doing the research is too much of a bother, then flake moderators will deal with it once a pattern emerges. Bullying them beyond explaining your reasoning in a polite way will not be tolerated, but being honest about concerns will make them take the responsibility seriously. Suggesting they go to a light game is the right thing to do for people who can't play at MU activity level yet. This seems like a solid way to appease everyone and make players take responsibility seriously since it is a peer based system instead of a numbers game. Attempting to get them blacklisted by others is also not a good look, but the community setting its own standards and being fair and human about them is as good as it gets. This community can self-moderate and this is one of the most important and relevant areas where doing that is the best option.
  20. Replies
    62
    Views
    1,072

    They should ask the players directly how many...

    Quote Originally Posted by soah (#12)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#11)
    QED the correct solution to the amount of sub outs is for hosts to properly vet their players and make sure they are able to keep up with the game and will not have an emergency before accepting their /in.
    How will they do that when you've said that the data on subbing will never be made public?
    They should ask the players directly how many times they expect to post that game, how many posts they think they can read per day phase, and if they are expecting any absences or extreme work conditions during the duration of the game.

    If they really think that data with small sample sets will help more than that, then: Assuming these are new players, they can look at the games they have played in the database and do the math themselves, and that is a short list.
  21. Replies
    62
    Views
    1,072

    Let's assume that two players play games at...

    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#8)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#3)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#2)
    If I were put in charge of flaking, here is what I do:

    When a player subs out, I review their playing history for the last 12 months. I determine their participation rate by dividing the number of games in which they did not sub out by the number of games in which they joined. If the present subout results in their participation rate dipping below 85%, I signup ban them until their participation rate reaches 85% or higher (as prior subouts drop off the rolling 12-month lookback period). 0/0 is deemed to be 100%.

    The duration of a signup ban is the SHORTER of the following two terms: a) the length of time it takes for the player's participation rate over the prior rolling 12 months to rise above 85% OR b):
    --1st signup ban = 1 month
    --2nd signup ban = 2 months
    --3rd signup ban = 4 months
    --4th and subsequent signup bans = 8 months

    Players who joined the site before the implementation of this policy will enjoy a warning instead of a 1-month ban for their first drop-down below 85%. A player who is allowed to participate after a warning or signup ban whose participation rate is still below 85% may not subout in such a way as to cause the participation rate to drop down to a rate below 85%, or the next sanction will be implemented.

    Since there seems to be very little stomach among the ruling class for anything that smacks of harshness, I doubt this proposal will ever be implemented, but I will start keeping records now as if I were in charge, with findings documented in a private thread that will be available to moderators or those to whom a moderator grants approval. For example, "Zork just subbed out of the October Vanilla game. His participation rate is now 82%, and I would have given him a warning."
    Math check:

    Player joins the site and plays 5 games without incident. On their 6th game, they sub out. This puts them at 83.33% participation. When the first game drops off their record, it will become 4/5 games, which will lower their percentage to 80%. This process will continue until their record is 0/0 or 100%. Since this period is a year, their ban will default to 1 month.

    All new players who sub out within their first six games will be banned for one month.
    Anecdotal evidence suggests that most subouts occur within a user's first six games on the site.

    I shouldn't need to tell you why this is detrimental to our goals.

    In addition, the process I outlined with decreasing participation rate with each dropoff will occur with all players, assuming that their sub outs are ordered either closer to the present, or randomly. The only cases where a dropoff will increase participation rate are cases where the other subouts, if any, are some of the oldest games in the 12-month period, and therefore drop off first.

    For most players, old and new alike, their first subout will get them a ban because they do not play with enough frequency to offset those numbers.
    Thank you for finding the problem in my paradigm. What I had in mind but didn't type out (proposed fix): Subouts are looked back for only one year, while the denominator is the total number of games played going back without limit.

    That fixes the main problem with my proposal. The other thing you mentioned about most subouts being noobies, I'm happy to extend the warning to everyone, even those who join after implementation.

    A balance must be found between the temp bans that would be detrimental to new blood feeling welcome on the one extreme and what has been going on in my humble opinion up until the flake mods were added.

    If flaking goes way down now that the new flake mods are on board, I don't need my proposal to make me happy, and I'm much happier hosting games than being a flake mod. But I'm here for the community and want to make it a better place.
    Let's assume that two players play games at exactly the same rate and sub out at exactly the same rate within the past year, but one of them has been here for 2 years, and that player just started subbing out recently.

    Player who has been here for 2 years and plays 6 games per year: 10/12 = 83.33%. First warning.
    Player who has been here for 1 year and played 6 games this year: First sub out is an immediate warning at 83.33%. Second sub out is a ban at 66.66%.

    No matter how you tweak this system, it is still harsher on newer players, who also happen to be the ones most likely to sub out, and the ones whose sub outs make the most sense given their lack of experience (not knowing what they are signing up for). You would have to allow a specific grace period to newer players to avoid scaring them away, and if we did that, we would be right back where we are now because most the sub outs you are complaining about fall under new players.

    QED the correct solution to the amount of sub outs is for hosts to properly vet their players and make sure they are able to keep up with the game and will not have an emergency before accepting their /in.

    Punishing players is sub-optimal compared to preventative medicine and showing them to the right games.
  22. Replies
    62
    Views
    1,072

    Math check: Player joins the site and plays 5...

    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#2)
    If I were put in charge of flaking, here is what I do:

    When a player subs out, I review their playing history for the last 12 months. I determine their participation rate by dividing the number of games in which they did not sub out by the number of games in which they joined. If the present subout results in their participation rate dipping below 85%, I signup ban them until their participation rate reaches 85% or higher (as prior subouts drop off the rolling 12-month lookback period). 0/0 is deemed to be 100%.

    The duration of a signup ban is the SHORTER of the following two terms: a) the length of time it takes for the player's participation rate over the prior rolling 12 months to rise above 85% OR b):
    --1st signup ban = 1 month
    --2nd signup ban = 2 months
    --3rd signup ban = 4 months
    --4th and subsequent signup bans = 8 months

    Players who joined the site before the implementation of this policy will enjoy a warning instead of a 1-month ban for their first drop-down below 85%. A player who is allowed to participate after a warning or signup ban whose participation rate is still below 85% may not subout in such a way as to cause the participation rate to drop down to a rate below 85%, or the next sanction will be implemented.

    Since there seems to be very little stomach among the ruling class for anything that smacks of harshness, I doubt this proposal will ever be implemented, but I will start keeping records now as if I were in charge, with findings documented in a private thread that will be available to moderators or those to whom a moderator grants approval. For example, "Zork just subbed out of the October Vanilla game. His participation rate is now 82%, and I would have given him a warning."
    Math check:

    Player joins the site and plays 5 games without incident. On their 6th game, they sub out. This puts them at 83.33% participation. When the first game drops off their record, it will become 4/5 games, which will lower their percentage to 80%. This process will continue until their record is 0/0 or 100%. Since this period is a year, their ban will default to 1 month.

    All new players who sub out within their first six games will be banned for one month.
    Anecdotal evidence suggests that most subouts occur within a user's first six games on the site.

    I shouldn't need to tell you why this is detrimental to our goals.

    In addition, the process I outlined with decreasing participation rate with each dropoff will occur with all players, assuming that their sub outs are ordered either closer to the present, or randomly. The only cases where a dropoff will increase participation rate are cases where the other subouts, if any, are some of the oldest games in the 12-month period, and therefore drop off first.

    For most players, old and new alike, their first subout will get them a ban because they do not play with enough frequency to offset those numbers.
  23. I sincerely apologize to anyone who was offended...

    Quote Originally Posted by Zack (#72)
    not sure why that matters but yes, I did see it and was active on the site during that cringeworthy april fool's joke
    I sincerely apologize to anyone who was offended by that. I took it for granted that Gizoogle was hilarious to everyone.
  24. You don't say

    Quote Originally Posted by Zack (#69)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#53)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mafia Host View Post
    7593 Day 2 Start

    Day 2 has begun.

    Hood must lynch erectly todizzle.

    Votes is locked. Y'all KNOW dat $#@!, muthafucka! Yo crazy-ass first vote is final. It aint nuthin but tha nick nack patty wack, I still gots tha bigger sack. Dizzle endz immediately upon majoritizzle or when mah playas has cast a vote.

    Living Players

    @AUTO
    @Captain Li Shang
    @Owen Wilson

    Day 2 ends at 1:08 PM EDT on Saturday, April 1st, 2017. There are 1491066540000 remaining.
    this is almost certainly more offensive than “lynch”
    You don't say
  25. Replies
    5
    Views
    156

    I'll probably do something like this with...

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantichora (#5)
    Would it be doable to do something like:

    Under Host Tools have a button labeled "Modbot Posts" (or smth). In that tab, you'd have a list of posts modbot needs to make for the game. There, you can edit each post like one could edit flips in the Deaths tab.
    I'll probably do something like this with variables, like how I do Role PMs right now.
  26. The idea has been floated. Donations don't cover...

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantichora (#64)
    I think the icon is fine, you just wouldn't print it on a tshirt.

    Not that we sell merch.
    The idea has been floated. Donations don't cover server costs last I checked.
  27. It is a decent argument. I'd be fine with going...

    Quote Originally Posted by Mantichora (#62)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#60)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#59)
    Quote Originally Posted by Virtuoso (#58)
    I think custom flavors are a good idea, especially if it goes nicely with a theme. That being said, I think there is a strong argument to be made that we should change the term "lynched" to something else all together. Lynching has a very negative and racist conotation. Over 4,000 African Americans were lynched for "crimes" such as trying to vote, drinking out of the wrong fountain, or looking at a white woman the wrong way. This is an excellent article from ThinkProgress:



    Thus I would favor "voted out" or "Executed" as better terminology.

    This is a serious post.


    Sources
    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart...tes-180961877/

    https://thinkprogress.org/smollett-f...-8029015428dc/
    See, I told you folks were serious about this.

    It will never end. Get rid of "lynch," and then someone will say we need to get rid of "voted out" because blacks didn't get the right to vote fully until the amendment against poll taxes was passed. Then someone will say we need to get rid of "executed" because blacks are executed for murders at a disproportionately higher rate than whites. We can all agree that lynching black folks, denying them the right to vote, and disproportionate sentencing to death are all horrible things that we have made substantial progress on as a society but that need, in the last example, further work. This is not a Republican or a Democrat thing. This is an American sentiment. But because there is no reassurance that the end will ever come, and that the PC crowd will ever be satisfied, I veto this sentiment AGAIN. And now I'm done. (Though my opposition is one of the surest ways to help make sure such a policy is implemented :eyeroll
    I'm glad we got how you feel about black people out of the way. Now we can get on to the real discussion.

    Lynch in the context of mafia... I have seen a lot of bystanders champion the cause because of the history of the language, but I have yet to see someone actually upset and think that the game is racist because of it. It has a different meaning in mafia, and I have never seen anyone ask what it meant or where it came from, or say that it offends them because of their own heritage. It always seems to be a second hand offense that the second hand person is more upset about than the original group they are defending.

    The iconography has been around since the game was made, notably not in the USA, but in Moscow, in the 80s. This seems like a United States centered change, and if my experience is right, it is more about people not wanting to be reminded of what their ancestors did to POC than about POC not wanting to be reminded about it (correct me if I am wrong, but I don't know the ethnic backgrounds of any of the defenders).
    The best argument about not using noose imagery I've seen is that it makes merch more marketable.

    That's about it.
    It is a decent argument. I'd be fine with going for werewolf imagery, but we're not werewolf universe.
  28. I'm glad we got how you feel about black people...

    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#59)
    Quote Originally Posted by Virtuoso (#58)
    I think custom flavors are a good idea, especially if it goes nicely with a theme. That being said, I think there is a strong argument to be made that we should change the term "lynched" to something else all together. Lynching has a very negative and racist conotation. Over 4,000 African Americans were lynched for "crimes" such as trying to vote, drinking out of the wrong fountain, or looking at a white woman the wrong way. This is an excellent article from ThinkProgress:

    Given its horrific history and the way it continues to roil the collective memory of black Americans, lynching — whether in imagery or rhetorically — should never be bandied about in a cavalier fashion, least of all by black men.

    It behooves us to recall some specifics.

    Lynching refers to the mob violence — typically meted out in an extrajudicial fashion — that was visited most often, although not exclusively, upon black men in southern states from the years immediately following the Civil War all the way through the middle of the 20th century. More often than not, a public execution followed trumped-up claims of sexual activity between a white woman and a black man.
    Thus I would favor "voted out" or "Executed" as better terminology.

    This is a serious post.


    Sources
    https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart...tes-180961877/

    https://thinkprogress.org/smollett-f...-8029015428dc/
    See, I told you folks were serious about this.

    It will never end. Get rid of "lynch," and then someone will say we need to get rid of "voted out" because blacks didn't get the right to vote fully until the amendment against poll taxes was passed. Then someone will say we need to get rid of "executed" because blacks are executed for murders at a disproportionately higher rate than whites. We can all agree that lynching black folks, denying them the right to vote, and disproportionate sentencing to death are all horrible things that we have made substantial progress on as a society but that need, in the last example, further work. This is not a Republican or a Democrat thing. This is an American sentiment. But because there is no reassurance that the end will ever come, and that the PC crowd will ever be satisfied, I veto this sentiment AGAIN. And now I'm done. (Though my opposition is one of the surest ways to help make sure such a policy is implemented :eyeroll
    I'm glad we got how you feel about black people out of the way. Now we can get on to the real discussion.

    Lynch in the context of mafia... I have seen a lot of bystanders champion the cause because of the history of the language, but I have yet to see someone actually upset and think that the game is racist because of it. It has a different meaning in mafia, and I have never seen anyone ask what it meant or where it came from, or say that it offends them because of their own heritage. It always seems to be a second hand offense that the second hand person is more upset about than the original group they are defending.

    The iconography has been around since the game was made, notably not in the USA, but in Moscow, in the 80s. This seems like a United States centered change, and if my experience is right, it is more about people not wanting to be reminded of what their ancestors did to POC than about POC not wanting to be reminded about it (correct me if I am wrong, but I don't know the ethnic backgrounds of any of the defenders).
  29. Well holla'd.

    Quote Originally Posted by Phighter (#56)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#53)
    Quote Originally Posted by Mafia Host View Post
    7593 Day 2 Start

    Day 2 has begun.

    Hood must lynch erectly todizzle.

    Votes is locked. Y'all KNOW dat $#@!, muthafucka! Yo crazy-ass first vote is final. It aint nuthin but tha nick nack patty wack, I still gots tha bigger sack. Dizzle endz immediately upon majoritizzle or when mah playas has cast a vote.

    Living Players

    @AUTO
    @Captain Li Shang
    @Owen Wilson

    Day 2 ends at 1:08 PM EDT on Saturday, April 1st, 2017. There are 1491066540000 remaining.
    I've never wanted ta downvote a post mo' up in tha history of Mafia Universe

    and fo'sho, dat includes tha times I've been flamed ta dirtnap lol
    Well holla'd.
  30. Replies
    5
    Views
    156

    Custom Flavor Text: Which Fields?

    Assuming I add custom flavor text options for things like "{name} was lynched" and the like, what other fields should I add?
  31. View Post

    Quote Originally Posted by Mafia Host View Post
    7593 Day 2 Start

    Day 2 has begun.

    Hood must lynch erectly todizzle.

    Votes is locked. Y'all KNOW dat $#@!, muthafucka! Yo crazy-ass first vote is final. It aint nuthin but tha nick nack patty wack, I still gots tha bigger sack. Dizzle endz immediately upon majoritizzle or when mah playas has cast a vote.

    Living Players

    @AUTO
    @Captain Li Shang
    @Owen Wilson

    Day 2 ends at 1:08 PM EDT on Saturday, April 1st, 2017. There are 1491066540000 remaining.
  32. If I were to add custom flavor options, what...

    If I were to add custom flavor options, what fields should I add (other than Lynch)?
  33. Good post.

    Quote Originally Posted by mendel (#33)
    I object to "cuddled". Using that verb here endorses gang cuddling without the consent of the cuddlee, and trivializes non-consensual intimacy.

    With "lynch", you already know that this is a decision made mostly divorced from reason that is as likely as not to hit an innocent person.

    A verb to replace needs to signify this kind of mob rule. I propose trampled to death.
    Make it an elephant-themed mafia, and you're golden.

    "Stoned" works for biblical favor, and also curries favor with the 4:20 crowd.
    "left behind" works for christmas pets and the outsider pupil on the school trip.
    "eaten for survival", maybe (the Donner Party setup exists and can be run with comletely historical flavor).
    "sacrificed to the dragon" or a deity of choice.
    "sent to buy snacks".
    "chosen as designated driver".
    Good post.
  34. Resolved You can now use @everyone to tag all players in...

    You can now use @everyone to tag all players in the game (Only accessible to hosts & mods).
  35. Resolved Hmm. I can make a shortcut like I did with p#1.

    Hmm. I can make a shortcut like I did with p#1.
  36. Replies
    34
    Views
    634

    Wouldn't that create a perverse incentive to...

    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#21)
    Seriously though, I think modbot could automatically calculate how many days you voted to lynch correctly as town and then automatically send you a PM, copying a mod, congratulating you when you hit 100 days or something, so they can pin a badge on you. Also there could be a highest-percent-correct award with minimum number of games tallied and not counting turbos or games in the testing thread.

    I could be coordinator if given powers to award the badges to folks who earn them.

    P.S.: There are a lot of achievements that could be recognized, some of them automatically via modbot, without creating achievements that would detract from a player's duty to play toward their win condition rather than some achievement.
    Wouldn't that create a perverse incentive to withhold your vote until you had a surefire lunch? It could even lead to players not voting once in a game, even for self-preservation.
  37. #4

    Thread: Emoticon Glitch

    by Makaze
    Replies
    4
    Views
    115

    Resolved [QUOTE=jumpluff;3522417]It's happened to me...

    [QUOTE=jumpluff;3522417]It's happened to me recently (and has for years).

    If you quote a post with the heart emoticon in it, it breaks.

    Example: https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums...=1#post3511016 I was quoting https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums...=1#post3505890 and when I switch that to Source Mode (since I post in the wysiwyg editor), it also cuts off like

    '\
    Quote Originally Posted by Lads;3505890\
    Yay!

    I feel like it's better to be safe when a Fas policy has already been played so BB did gud. and anyway I think Jump is Lib '

    Slashes are mine.

    If you write it with the less than symbol and a 3 in the rich text editor, it can break your post as well.

    I wonder does the text

    edit: Initially, when I wrote the heart in this, with the shortcut less than three (actual symbols) in the wysiwyg editor and posted, the whole sentence 'I wonder does this text show up' showed up. Then I moved to edit it and it disappeared from the source EVEN BEFORE I WENT TO SUBMIT IT - like I pressed back and it was gone, I think.

    Maybe it's some kind of parsing error gone wrong and it's trying to strip what it thinks is html.

    I'm sure there has been a previous topic on this.
    This isn't new with the rich editor. I don't have access to the rich editor though.
  38. #1

    Thread: Emoticon Glitch

    by Makaze
    Replies
    4
    Views
    115

    Resolved What is the emoticon? Are you using it as a...

    What is the emoticon?

    Are you using it as a special character, or entering the code such as :heart: ?
  39. Postgame#8222

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed This will forever be known to me as the Loud Game.

    This will forever be known to me as the Loud Game.
  40. Postgame#6959

    Thread: Bone Mafia Game Thread

    by Makaze
    Replies
    6,992
    Views
    29,125

    Completed I'm pretty sure that per the mechanics, the doc...

    Quote Originally Posted by iaafr (#6897)
    Quote Originally Posted by iaafr (#6873)
    n1: factional kill and sk kill on me, alice (bg) protected me, yolo (doc) protected me

    wasn't alice supposed to die there
    @Makaze
    I'm pretty sure that per the mechanics, the doc happened first, and therefore the BG didn't process since you weren't dying.

    Doc saves from all damage, not just one shot.
  41. Replies
    88
    Views
    1,197

    The information will be available but it will not...

    Quote Originally Posted by Apoc (#19)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#16)
    Posting these publicly is never happening.
    This is a pretty aggressive statement for what is literally publicly available information

    Anyone with the desire to do so can go through the game threads and count


    Do you plan on intentionally removing sub out information from the database when its done?
    The information will be available but it will not be searchable, and you will have to do the data mining on your own (unless you're staff).
  42. Replies
    88
    Views
    1,197

    Posting these publicly is never happening.

    Posting these publicly is never happening.
  43. Day 2#4202

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed Makaze

    ##Vote Makaze
  44. Day 2#4107

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed I have not lied about anything and I am pissed at...

    I have not lied about anything and I am pissed at the mods for randing it
  45. Day 2#4083

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed Weak watcher survivor represent

    Weak watcher survivor represent
  46. Day 2#3796

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed I have to get back to work, but I'll keep checking

    I have to get back to work, but I'll keep checking
  47. Day 2#3780

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed self-pres isn't strictly necessary since I am...

    Quote Originally Posted by Stork (#3767)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#3749)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stork (#3744)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#3740)
    i don't know how else to explain it unless he's mafia
    yes
    that is exactly how you have to explain it. :thumb:
    why do you think i am still voting?
    right
    but your focus is all wrong

    you need to focus on WHY he is a wolf outside of the claim, because we the villagers do not care about the claims, they happened, and now you are polarised to w/v.
    and he is very more villageryier than you
    self-pres isn't strictly necessary since I am going to flip anyway, so I'd rather do some thinking instead of straight up wolfside

    you seem to want this to happen more than I do
  48. Day 2#3769

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed because it's what happened and there is no point...

    Quote Originally Posted by Aquilla (#3756)
    Quote Originally Posted by Visorslash (#3743)
    heres the thing

    there is not two village backups itg unless they back up different roles (ie, cop backup and vig backup)

    neither player is claiming that

    if there are two village backups in this game that are both universal backups then strip manti from his greenship because that is lord tier werewolf design

    i still don't know why makaze claimed loud backup though, seems weird

    but i think cuth is far more villagery so shrug
    not only is cuth more villager, but ccing that type of role is suicide.
    because it's what happened and there is no point in me dying

    the only thing that makes me think it's not cuth is that he can't even fake it out without the innocent claim, he has no reason to waste his town cred to finish me
  49. Day 2#3749

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed why do you think i am still voting?

    Quote Originally Posted by Stork (#3744)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#3740)
    Quote Originally Posted by Stork (#3728)
    Quote Originally Posted by Makaze (#3721)
    I buy that he has the same role as me, but I don't buy that he's an innocent child on top of being universal
    WHAT ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT

    Are you agreeing that he has the village version of your wolf role????

    in what sense do two backups make sense in a 19er???
    WHAT IF A ROLE DIED n1 THEN THE WOLVES ARE PUNISHED FOR IT BECAUSE IT GETS BACKED UP TWICE

    crazy pills

    AHHHHHHHHHhhhhhh
    i don't know how else to explain it unless he's mafia
    yes
    that is exactly how you have to explain it. :thumb:
    why do you think i am still voting?
  50. Day 2#3746

    Thread: Staff Party (No Normies)

    by Makaze
    Replies
    8,223
    Views
    29,022

    Completed (┛ಠ_ಠ)┛彡┻━┻

    Quote Originally Posted by Stork (#3739)
    the reason i don't believe mak is because i am also a village backup

    hehe
    (┛ಠ_ಠ)┛彡┻━┻
Results 1 to 50 of 3000
Page 1 of 60 1 2 3 4
about us
Mafia Universe is a community hub for people who enjoy playing the forum variant of Mafia (also known as Werewolf). We offer fully automated Mafia games and a wide variety of customized features crafted to optimize your game experience. We also proudly host the Internet's only database of Mafia/Werewolf communities.

We hope you stick around!
Role of the Day
Vigilante

The Vigilante may kill a player each night.