was hopeful for end but alas
Type: Posts; User: primordial woopons
was hopeful for end but alas
Yep and there’s the Mak vote
Oh $%#! I thought it was 3/3
I’m fine with rand
Part of me also just doesn’t really want to have to live through another phase :/
Like what gives me pause about scum!Chelsea is that I just feel like she would be playing better. Scum!Claire feels like the duh read here.
Uhh if I’m wrong about Chelsea we just lose and I don’t feel great about it given the depth to which I thought it
Ah $%#! let me think
Do not feel confident arguing this at lylo
So I guess we have 20 minutes
Honestly I do think my lynch at this point would be best for game state
And then what’s your reasoning for ria again? Why has it held up in lieu of everything that’s happened since then (did it fluctuate at any point?)
Oh yes @Claire the above question
I can’t tell if Claire would be seriously trying to pocket me or not. If she shows up I really would like to know why she seemed to firmly townread me.
And to reiterate, I think given the player list and events of D1-3, I don’t think a team of Mak/Claire would have the chance to take control, if the argument is for their rep. D1 they were both under heat, D2 was dominated by supa and they would operate more subtly, and D3 was just a crapshoot all around except for amy/supa/pb
Sorry if that’s crude :/
Does Claire have everyone by the balls or something?
$%#! it, cheap-o town clears are overpowered, it’s Claire
If it was really just sully/Claire, then that’s like, lmao
And what was your stance on Claire?
Or certainly not tend towards the explanation that if he did it, then me doing is reason to scumread me. I think he’d judge as null.
Tbf I feel like I’m picking at smaller things against the grand scheme of Makaze, just cause they are directly relevant to me and I’m not going to read everything he posts. My motivation largely comes from PoE, and this is just makes more sense than the alternatives
I think he would factor in the tonality of my posts more. He uses tone reads on everyone else and I know my tone is town, but iirc he hasn’t shown that he’s factored that into his case. Like him using his own doc claim to shade mine; I think town!Makaze would be able to look at that objectively, also given my explanation for why I did it.
You still didn’t answer the question. How do you as town think me dumping my thoughts is anti-spew when you know there are easier ways to anti-spew. Why does this not overrule your thought that I would play dead? Even if I wouldn’t play dead as scum, how are the posts even trying to save my prospective buddies?
The idea that Claire/Makaze would have more control now I think is what has to give wrt the remaining associatives.
@Makaze please tell me precisely how my thought dump “does not make sense” and “is full of contradictions”. Why does town!Makaze here not even make the effort to entertain how there is a consistent thought process to the posts
Actually psycho, what do you think of Mak calling my posts anti-spew. Would town Makaze really think this?
I’m going back and forth on Sully/Claire now. My gut is telling me it’s not Sully/pluff and that Makaze’s case on Sully is on the same order as mine, where it’s just, townies do scummy things all the time, and it’s easy to manipulate that
Or is there hammer now?
Re that one question @Makaze: wow fair enough I’m blind. I think it was part of the greater point that I feel like you’re consciously ignoring my town tells because you need to construct and push this case. I feel the same way looking at the psycho case now, on the surface it looks good, but really you just took of posts which are fine and called them scummy. You’re doing the same thing to my posts - I feel like you are manifesting a natural town sort of doubt.
Actually why am I addressing this to Makaze. Makaze is consistently taking NAI posts and painting them as scummy. Despite what he says about players not having natural progression, it’s his own posts which are unnatural. What psycho says is true, town reads jump much more freely but I don’t if Makaze has done that once this game. His case progression, I guess in particular the last few days feels entirely constructed with the point to line up mislynches.
I think it’s interesting he brings up a point about how psycho was trying to widen Poe when this is exactly what he did in one of his posts where he said “there are too many scum in this game”, which was very much at odds with the majority of town at the time. I didn’t think much of it at the time, but I feel like now this makes perfect sense to setup pushing for people being mostly townread.
In my mind it’s as simple as it’s not PB/supa and I reaaaallly don’t think it’s ria/psycho and I don’t think it’s Claire/Sully so it has to be Mak
I took a nap and am back.
And I guess I want to ask - did you really think I was anti-spewing and not also think “no that doesn’t make sense, if he wanted to anti-spew he would just not post”?
I was wrong on each of those players cause I didn’t pay close attention to their posts and chose wrong when it mattered.
Look at how Makaze refuses to acknowledge every reason there is to townread me. @Makaze you keep calling me out on dodging questions so why did you dodge mine?
Yes posting every thought you have makes sense as anti-spew, of course
Actually is them not having control based on your own read or cause that’s the general consensus?
I guess for starters are you familiar with jumpluff’s meta?