Page 6 of 7 FirstFirst ... 4567 LastLast
Results 251 to 300 of 335

Thread: Mafia Championship Season 7 - Setup Discussion

  1. ISO #251
    Soul Reader [NSM] Mikey's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Posts
    3,771
    Community
    NSM, FFR,Smogon, ZeldaDungeon, The Syndicate, 2+2, DailyMafia, elsewhere
    I'm a proponent of cardflips off
    it's what I was raised on for some time

  2. ISO #252
    Hype! Arapocalypse's Avatar Discord Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    27,779
    Community
    Mafia Games Discord
    AKA
    Ara
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by GeneralHankerchief (#229)
    Quote Originally Posted by Newcomb (#228)
    W I T C H
    U
    N
    T
    I would actually consider participating in a Witch Hunt Champs season just to experience it with a bunch of other people struggling through it for the first time.

    ara don't you dare

  3. ISO #253
    Wants It More beruru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    capital of books
    Posts
    9,738
    Timezone
    UTC-08:00
    Community
    Gaia Online
    Pronouns
    they/them/their/theirs/themself
    Gender
    oh yeah

    I forgot that forum mafia has flips

  4. ISO #254
    Soul Reader Soneji's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Florida Keys
    Posts
    1,814
    Timezone
    UTC-05:00
    Community
    Narutoforums
    AKA
    WolfPrinceKouga, WPK
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaleb (#245)
    Quote Originally Posted by Soneji (#243)
    Not to say flipless is impossible even in forum mafia, but it's ridiculously wolf-sided and far from what most communities are used to.
    And that's different to all of the other seasons why?
    We're supposed to be aiming for a less wolf-sided setup, not more. Going flipless would be to metaphorically flip the table over and say "$#@! you!" to balance entirely.

  5. ISO #255
    Wants It More beruru's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    capital of books
    Posts
    9,738
    Timezone
    UTC-08:00
    Community
    Gaia Online
    Pronouns
    they/them/their/theirs/themself
    Gender
    flipless is a different skillset like how mountainous is a different skillset

    it's not like you never get alignment info. flipless setups are designed so that you get alignment info in other ways

  6. ISO #256
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by beruru (#255)
    flipless is a different skillset like how mountainous is a different skillset

    it's not like you never get alignment info. flipless setups are designed so that you get alignment info in other ways
    I don't think the culture here would tolerate the kind of radical change in balance that I think would be needed in terms of numbers, etc., that would be required to facilitate a flipless roleset that Town would win 45-55% of the time.

  7. ISO #257
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    18,182
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Community
    EpicMafia/DailyMafia
    AKA
    Onuzq
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Soneji (#254)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaleb (#245)
    Quote Originally Posted by Soneji (#243)
    Not to say flipless is impossible even in forum mafia, but it's ridiculously wolf-sided and far from what most communities are used to.
    And that's different to all of the other seasons why?
    We're supposed to be aiming for a less wolf-sided setup, not more. Going flipless would be to metaphorically flip the table over and say "$#@! you!" to balance entirely.
    It's more shocking imo. Gotta world build instead of knowing everything when getting late

  8. ISO #258
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaleb (#257)
    Quote Originally Posted by Soneji (#254)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaleb (#245)
    Quote Originally Posted by Soneji (#243)
    Not to say flipless is impossible even in forum mafia, but it's ridiculously wolf-sided and far from what most communities are used to.
    And that's different to all of the other seasons why?
    We're supposed to be aiming for a less wolf-sided setup, not more. Going flipless would be to metaphorically flip the table over and say "$#@! you!" to balance entirely.
    It's more shocking imo. Gotta world build instead of knowing everything when getting late
    I love creativity, including flipless, which is why I'm going to run one. But I doubt I'll get enough signers because when people see the ratio of Town to Mafia they'll all say "omg townsided."

  9. ISO #259
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?

  10. ISO #260
    Hype! Arapocalypse's Avatar Discord Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    27,779
    Community
    Mafia Games Discord
    AKA
    Ara
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#259)
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?
    In order for it to be suitable for champs, the game wouldn't end on death of the third mafia; send the players to F3 regardless of if the mafia is alive or not!!!

    Helps ensure that players get as much chance to show off their skills as possible!!

  11. ISO #261
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#260)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#259)
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?
    In order for it to be suitable for champs, the game wouldn't end on death of the third mafia; send the players to F3 regardless of if the mafia is alive or not!!!

    Helps ensure that players get as much chance to show off their skills as possible!!
    I...I...think I'm in love with that idea.

    3 Townies in F3.

    You'd have to let it go to the bitter end each time because otherwise they'd know they got the wolf.

    It's genius actually.

  12. ISO #262
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Visor you might get that chest hair after all...

  13. ISO #263
    Banned
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Posts
    18,182
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Community
    EpicMafia/DailyMafia
    AKA
    Onuzq
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#260)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#259)
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?
    In order for it to be suitable for champs, the game wouldn't end on death of the third mafia; send the players to F3 regardless of if the mafia is alive or not!!!

    Helps ensure that players get as much chance to show off their skills as possible!!
    People can figure out that there's 0 mafia alive after f5 cause there is no kp the next night.

  14. ISO #264
    Straight White Male wiggles1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    34,541
    Timezone
    UTC±00:00
    Community
    DailyMafia
    AKA
    The Potato King
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#200)
    Quote Originally Posted by Lissa (#198)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#196)
    Quote Originally Posted by bbt (#195)
    Does tracking an arsonist when they ignite even return any result? iirc the target is set to null in modbot.
    Tracker should get a result of "Arsonist visited Victim."

    @Makaze can confirm
    Dousing tracks, igniting doesn't
    Would they detect motion on an ignite target?
    Flavour wise theres a gas trail to the arsonists house and he doesn't go anywhere and just ignites the trail.

  15. ISO #265
    Straight White Male wiggles1993's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    34,541
    Timezone
    UTC±00:00
    Community
    DailyMafia
    AKA
    The Potato King
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    So he really does nothing

  16. ISO #266
    Hype! Arapocalypse's Avatar Discord Moderator
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    27,779
    Community
    Mafia Games Discord
    AKA
    Ara
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaleb (#263)
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#260)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#259)
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?
    In order for it to be suitable for champs, the game wouldn't end on death of the third mafia; send the players to F3 regardless of if the mafia is alive or not!!!

    Helps ensure that players get as much chance to show off their skills as possible!!
    People can figure out that there's 0 mafia alive after f5 cause there is no kp the next night.
    Not if the factional kill is mandatory, regardless of if faction members are alive or not!!!

  17. ISO #267
    Wants It More LanMisa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2018
    Location
    German Democratic Republic (former)
    Posts
    7,538
    Timezone
    UTC+01:00
    Community
    Forum Paradox
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#266)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaleb (#263)
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#260)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#259)
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?
    In order for it to be suitable for champs, the game wouldn't end on death of the third mafia; send the players to F3 regardless of if the mafia is alive or not!!!

    Helps ensure that players get as much chance to show off their skills as possible!!
    People can figure out that there's 0 mafia alive after f5 cause there is no kp the next night.
    Not if the factional kill is mandatory, regardless of if faction members are alive or not!!!
    And I got harsh and massive criticism when I talked about flipless games smh...

  18. ISO #268
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#266)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaleb (#263)
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#260)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#259)
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?
    In order for it to be suitable for champs, the game wouldn't end on death of the third mafia; send the players to F3 regardless of if the mafia is alive or not!!!

    Helps ensure that players get as much chance to show off their skills as possible!!
    People can figure out that there's 0 mafia alive after f5 cause there is no kp the next night.
    Not if the factional kill is mandatory, regardless of if faction members are alive or not!!!
    Modbot cannot handle your setup. The latest you can procrastinate game completion is true victory. I've been asking for a setting that would keep the game going until manually ended due to some setup variations I've had (none of which had only town alive, don't get me wrong).

  19. ISO #269
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#266)
    Quote Originally Posted by Jaleb (#263)
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#260)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#259)
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?
    In order for it to be suitable for champs, the game wouldn't end on death of the third mafia; send the players to F3 regardless of if the mafia is alive or not!!!

    Helps ensure that players get as much chance to show off their skills as possible!!
    People can figure out that there's 0 mafia alive after f5 cause there is no kp the next night.
    Not if the factional kill is mandatory, regardless of if faction members are alive or not!!!
    If/when Makaze adds a "don't end til I say so" setting, it should be tested to make sure factional kills continue even in the absence of non-Town when set at mandatory. I wonder how "assigned" would work in that regard.

  20. ISO #270
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Arapocalypse (#260)
    Quote Originally Posted by Zork (#259)
    Completely flipless makes no sense. I mean, the last wolf is always flipless because it ends the game when you kill them so that doesn't matter.

    You have to have 3 wolves for flipless to make sense, and the best challenge is to make only the second one flip, DUCY?
    In order for it to be suitable for champs, the game wouldn't end on death of the third mafia; send the players to F3 regardless of if the mafia is alive or not!!!

    Helps ensure that players get as much chance to show off their skills as possible!!
    If Champs could be judged on a point system, there should be a boatload of bonus points if Town gets to F3 with exclusively Town and they all correctly vote no lynch. What a gamble!

  21. ISO #271
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    5 more please so we can start tomorrow on time

    may have to start Tuesday

  22. ISO #272
    GOAT Tier bearsquared's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    15,818
    Timezone
    UTC-05:00
    Community
    MiniMafia
    Gender
    This might be more structure related, but I'm going to map out potential tournament structures based on setup size (15, 13, 17) to see how they may differ, and see how they look when you try to align them as much as possible (using GH's proposed structure for 15 as a baseline).

    Label Slots Qualifers QT VSPG VA VA % JA JA % Wildcards WCT WCTA % FAPG FAR WCFA % FA % TG
    15er 15 10 150 2 20 13.33% 25 16.67% 3 45 30.00% 5 0 33.33% 3.33% 14
    13er (Up) 13 12 156 2 24 15.38% 28 17.95% 4 52 33.33% 3 1 25.00% 1.92% 17
    13er (Down) 13 11 143 1 11 7.69% 28 19.58% 3 39 27.27% 4 1 33.33% 2.80% 15
    13er (Nearest) 13 12 156 1 12 7.69% 27 17.31% 3 39 25.00% 4 1 33.33% 2.56% 16
    13er (Same) 13 10 130 1 10 7.69% 29 22.31% 3 39 30.00% 4 1 33.33% 3.08% 14
    13er (Same 2) 13 10 130 2 20 15.38% 19 14.62% 3 39 30.00% 4 1 33.33% 3.08% 14
    17er (Up) 17 9 153 2 18 11.76% 33 21.57% 3 51 33.33% 5 2 33.33% 3.27% 13
    17er (Up 2) 17 9 153 3 27 17.65% 24 15.69% 3 51 33.33% 5 2 33.33% 3.27% 13
    17er (Down) 17 8 136 2 16 11.76% 18 13.24% 2 34 25.00% 8 1 50.00% 5.88% 11
    17er (Same) 17 10 170 2 20 11.76% 31 18.24% 3 51 30.00% 5 2 33.33% 2.94% 14


    Label = Structure Label
    Slots = Number of players per game
    Qualifiers = Number of qualifier games
    QT = Qualifier Total => Total number of players in qualifier games
    VSPG = Voted slots per game => how many players advance to wildcards by votes
    VA = Vote Advanced => Total number players advanced to wildcards via votes
    VA % = Vote Advanced % => Percentage of total number of players advanced to wildcards via votes
    JA = Jury Advanced => Total number players advanced to wildcards via Jury
    JA % = Jury Advanced % => Percentage of total number players advanced to wildcards via Jury
    Wildcards = Number of wildcard games
    WCT = Wildcard Total => Total number of players in wildcard games
    WCTA % = Wildcard Total Advanced => Percentage of total number of players advanced to wildcards
    FAPG = Finals Advanced Per Game => Total number of players advanced to finals per game
    FAR = Finals Advanced Remainder => Total number of players leftover after FAPG * Wildcard Games; if this value is non-zero, the number of players advanced per wildcard game does not produce enough players and the number represents how many players will need to be advanced using some other method
    WCFA % = Wildcard Finals Advanced => Percentage of players in wildcards to advance to finals
    FA % = Finals Advanced % => Percentage of total number of players to advance to finals
    TG = Total Games => Total number of games

    Labels are the size of the setup followed by how I rounded the numbers relative to the number of players in each round determined by the 15er structure. For example, 13er (Up) I rounded the number of qualifiers up to get over 150, and the number of wildcard games up to get over 45. 13er (Nearest) chose the number games that resulted in the closest values to the 15er values. 17er (Up) also happens to be 17er (Nearest) so I only listed it once.

    13er (Same), 13er (Same 2), and 17er (Same) used the same number of games per round as 15er (10 and 3).

    13er (Same 2) advances 2 players per game by vote rather than 1. 17er (Up 2) advances 3 players per game by vote rather than 2.

    The number of players advanced by votes was always less than the number of players advanced by jury except in 13er (Same 2).


    Without knowing exactly what the priorities are for a good tournament structure it's difficult to provide a truly useful analysis, but if the 15er structure is assumed to represent ideal or close to ideal numbers, the best choice for setup size would be... 15. Obviously. The closest non-15 player setup structure to the 15er one is unclear, and still depends on what is prioritized.

    13ers

    Of the 13er structures, 13er (Nearest) produces the closest qualifer and wildcard totals (+6 and -6) respectively, but advances significantly fewer players to wildcards via voting and adds an additional 2 games to the tournament by requiring 12 qualifier games. 13er (Same 2) has 20 less total participants, but advances the exact same number of players via votes and a fewer, but similar, number of players via Jury. The number of total games remains the same at 14.

    All 13er structures (and 17ers in fact) have a similar problem in that you can't advance an even number of players from each game to the finals. You would have one slot that you'd need to fill somehow.

    17ers

    17er (Up) and 17er (Up 2) is closest overall numbers wise with 153 (+3) and 51 (+6) with similar ratios of players advancing to wildcards and finals, and has 1 fewer game overall (13). 17er (Up) more heavily weighs Jury advancement than voting relative to the 15er whereas 17er (Up 2) has much closer ratios of players advanced by vote/jury, but more players are advanced via vote than Jury (27 to 24).

    17er (Down) reduces the number of games total by 3 (11 total), and wildcard games by 1 (2 total) a much smaller percentage of total players to wildcards, and larger percentage of total players to finals. The number of players overall is reduced by 14 as well. I feel like fewer players in wildcards is not really a desirable property for the tournament structure.

    17er (Same) is reasonable, but increasing the total number of players to 170 seems potentially difficult. This could be mitigated by giving some communities a second slot, or having some other qualification though, and it's numbers/ratios seem pretty good otherwise.

    17er (Up), 17er (Up 2), and 17er (Same) all have 2 slots remaining for finals after wildcard voting which seems marginally more difficult to resolve than 1 slot remaining, but can probably be handled by taking a couple of 6th place finishers from wildcard games.

  23. ISO #273
    GOAT Tier bearsquared's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2017
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    15,818
    Timezone
    UTC-05:00
    Community
    MiniMafia
    Gender
    Something I had thought of to solve/mitigate the "night 1 problem" was more or less automatically advancing N1 kills to wildcards or some kind of intermediate "redemption" round. I ran the numbers for those like I did in my last post:

    Label Slots Qualifers QT N1A VSPG VA VA % JA JA % Wildcards WCT WCTA % FAPG FAR WCFA % TG
    15er 15 10 150 10 1 10 6.67% 25 16.67% 3 45 30.00% 5 0 33.33% 14
    13er (Up) 13 12 156 12 1 12 7.69% 28 17.95% 4 52 33.33% 3 1 25.00% 17
    13er (Down) 13 11 143 11 1 11 7.69% 17 11.89% 3 39 27.27% 4 1 33.33% 15
    13er (Nearest) 13 12 156 12 1 12 7.69% 15 9.62% 3 39 25.00% 4 1 33.33% 16
    13er (Same) 13 10 130 10 1 10 7.69% 19 14.62% 3 39 30.00% 4 1 33.33% 14
    17er (Up) 17 9 153 9 2 18 11.76% 24 15.69% 3 51 33.33% 5 2 33.33% 13
    17er (Down) 17 8 136 8 1 8 5.88% 18 13.24% 2 34 25.00% 8 1 50.00% 11
    17er (Same) 17 10 170 10 1 10 5.88% 31 18.24% 3 51 30.00% 5 2 33.33% 14
    15er + 1 WC 15 10 150 10 2 20 13.33% 30 20.00% 4 60 40.00% 3 3 25.00% 15
    13er (Up) + 1 WC 13 12 156 12 2 24 15.38% 29 18.59% 5 65 41.67% 2 3 20.00% 18
    13er (Down) + 1 WC 13 11 143 11 1 11 7.69% 30 20.98% 4 52 36.36% 3 1 25.00% 16
    13er (Nearest) + 1 WC 13 12 156 12 1 12 7.69% 28 17.95% 4 52 33.33% 3 1 25.00% 17
    13er (Same) + 1 WC 13 10 130 10 2 20 15.38% 22 16.92% 4 52 40.00% 3 1 25.00% 15
    17er (Up) + 1 WC 17 9 153 9 3 27 17.65% 32 20.92% 4 68 44.44% 4 1 25.00% 14
    17er (Down) + 1 WC 17 8 136 8 2 16 11.76% 27 19.85% 3 51 37.50% 5 2 33.33% 12
    17er (Same) + 1 WC 17 10 170 10 2 20 11.76% 38 22.35% 4 68 40.00% 4 1 25.00% 15

    With the same number of wildcard games (or really just post-qualifier games) then voting takes a pretty big hit in terms of significance if you always keep the number of players advanced by Jury greater than that of voting. Adding a 4th WC/post-qualifier game helped significantly to make the voting/Jury advancement ratios closer, and there is some room to tweak numbers. Seems potentially viable though if a few of the details are ironed out.

  24. ISO #274
    buys toilet paper on the dark web Phighter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Sixers Territory
    Posts
    52,152
    Community
    XHF, MU
    AKA
    Caffrey
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Does the setup matter if the jury is still just a bunch of MU voices?

  25. ISO #275

    Wants It More

    FTFlush's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    FarOut'sVille
    Posts
    9,857
    Timezone
    UTC-04:00
    Community
    Pokemon Showdown!
    AKA
    ForgotToFlush
    Gender
    but what about role madn-



  26. ISO #276
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by FTFlush (#275)
    but what about role madn-


    I offered to host the following setup, but was told there isn't enough time to complete the game and get feedback before organizing the Championship:

    Mafia (mandatory assigned nightly factional kill except n2):
    x1 Arsonist | Cycles 1, 2
    x1 Arsonist | Cycles 2, 3
    x1 Goon | x1 Ninja


    Town:
    x1 Jack of All Trades | Tracker x9, Doctor x9, Motion Detector x9
    x1 Firefighter | Cycles 1, 2, 3
    x1 Innocent Child | Cycle 3
    x9 Vanilla

  27. ISO #277
    bbt's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2018
    Posts
    3,411
    Timezone
    UTC-05:00
    Community
    The Cave of Dragonflies
    AKA
    Eifie, zeep
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by bbt (#156)
    I know this isn't really the thread for it, but I think the idea of running a champs lite or something where communities signing up for champs can sign up for one of the two is worth some serious consideration! (But I would not do it in the same year as mountainous because I do still have the impression that there's a very large overlap between communities where they play much lower-volume games and communities with more emphasis on night play.)
    I don't know if anyone besides @roro__b cares but I guess I'll bring this up again anyway because why not.

    Wouldn't happen this year, but it seems like the invite survey thing would be a good way to gather data to see if this would be well-received next year? Like the thing the rep from each community fills out where they give game preferences and stuff could have a question asking if, instead of participating in the regular tournament with no/very high post restrictions, they could participate in a lighter version with a 100 post restriction or something, would they want to do so? And give actual numbers for what postcounts looked like with the 175 post restriction last year (especially from the wildcard games) along with it.

    If a lot of reps answer "yes" then it could be something to do for next year and if not then we have actual data that this would not be that well-received, which I don't think we really have at the moment since I don't really think sites where players are used to lower-volume games are all that well-represented among the MU regulars.

    dobby pls thank post so i don't feel like i'm screaming into the void

  28. ISO #278
    Special Agent tbh Boquise's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    12,638
    Community
    mafiamaniac
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by bbt (#277)
    Quote Originally Posted by bbt (#156)
    I know this isn't really the thread for it, but I think the idea of running a champs lite or something where communities signing up for champs can sign up for one of the two is worth some serious consideration! (But I would not do it in the same year as mountainous because I do still have the impression that there's a very large overlap between communities where they play much lower-volume games and communities with more emphasis on night play.)
    I don't know if anyone besides @roro__b cares but I guess I'll bring this up again anyway because why not.

    Wouldn't happen this year, but it seems like the invite survey thing would be a good way to gather data to see if this would be well-received next year? Like the thing the rep from each community fills out where they give game preferences and stuff could have a question asking if, instead of participating in the regular tournament with no/very high post restrictions, they could participate in a lighter version with a 100 post restriction or something, would they want to do so? And give actual numbers for what postcounts looked like with the 175 post restriction last year (especially from the wildcard games) along with it.

    If a lot of reps answer "yes" then it could be something to do for next year and if not then we have actual data that this would not be that well-received, which I don't think we really have at the moment since I don't really think sites where players are used to lower-volume games are all that well-represented among the MU regulars.

    dobby pls thank post so i don't feel like i'm screaming into the void
    I remember that my ol' home community always saw the activity on MU as a big hurdle. And very few (only like me) where alright with playing mountainous. Many excellent players have decided not to play because of those setbacks. And I also remember how difficult it was to adjust myself to MU and I still think I haven't adjusted completely. So I hear ya.

    I think a light version would be good, not only for a sake of data but to put more people across the interwebz to play together.

    The issue is logistics I guess, getting people to host etc.

  29. ISO #279
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Boquise (#278)
    Quote Originally Posted by bbt (#277)
    Quote Originally Posted by bbt (#156)
    I know this isn't really the thread for it, but I think the idea of running a champs lite or something where communities signing up for champs can sign up for one of the two is worth some serious consideration! (But I would not do it in the same year as mountainous because I do still have the impression that there's a very large overlap between communities where they play much lower-volume games and communities with more emphasis on night play.)
    I don't know if anyone besides @roro__b cares but I guess I'll bring this up again anyway because why not.

    Wouldn't happen this year, but it seems like the invite survey thing would be a good way to gather data to see if this would be well-received next year? Like the thing the rep from each community fills out where they give game preferences and stuff could have a question asking if, instead of participating in the regular tournament with no/very high post restrictions, they could participate in a lighter version with a 100 post restriction or something, would they want to do so? And give actual numbers for what postcounts looked like with the 175 post restriction last year (especially from the wildcard games) along with it.

    If a lot of reps answer "yes" then it could be something to do for next year and if not then we have actual data that this would not be that well-received, which I don't think we really have at the moment since I don't really think sites where players are used to lower-volume games are all that well-represented among the MU regulars.

    dobby pls thank post so i don't feel like i'm screaming into the void
    I remember that my ol' home community always saw the activity on MU as a big hurdle. And very few (only like me) where alright with playing mountainous. Many excellent players have decided not to play because of those setbacks. And I also remember how difficult it was to adjust myself to MU and I still think I haven't adjusted completely. So I hear ya.

    I think a light version would be good, not only for a sake of data but to put more people across the interwebz to play together.

    The issue is logistics I guess, getting people to host etc.
    I volunteer to host. Preferably the setup I ran that got only positive feedback that I can recall. Balanced and not mountainous.

  30. ISO #280
    Bandwagoner Kingslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Liverpool ,UK
    Posts
    68
    Timezone
    UTC+00:00
    Community
    Worst Generation Forum
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Hi , @Thingyman WorstGen is new One piece forum hope you advertise your pagge in our forum .

    https://worstgen.alwaysdata.net/foru...pionship.3793/

  31. ISO #281
    Bandwagoner Kingslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Liverpool ,UK
    Posts
    68
    Timezone
    UTC+00:00
    Community
    Worst Generation Forum
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    I cannot PM thingyman is something wrong with the site ?

  32. ISO #282
    vast tonal gap Lissa's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    48,888
    Timezone
    UTC-07:00
    Community
    Ultimate Mafia / Mafia Universe
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Kingslayer (#281)
    I cannot PM thingyman is something wrong with the site ?
    hi!

    You need 3 posts or manually given permissions to PM; it's a spam/etc preventive measure, sorry!

    I actually already do have WorstGen on the invite list, it's just a bit of a process to work through the list; I'll hit you up with the invite and you can share it there!

    edit: looks like Ara did this already, so I won't double up
    Last edited by Lissa; April 5th, 2020 at 12:54 AM.

  33. ISO #283
    Bandwagoner Kingslayer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Liverpool ,UK
    Posts
    68
    Timezone
    UTC+00:00
    Community
    Worst Generation Forum
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Lissa (#282)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kingslayer (#281)
    I cannot PM thingyman is something wrong with the site ?
    hi!

    You need 3 posts or manually given permissions to PM; it's a spam/etc preventive measure, sorry!

    I actually already do have WorstGen on the invite list, it's just a bit of a process to work through the list; I'll hit you up with the invite and you can share it there!

    edit: looks like Ara did this already, so I won't double up
    Thanks lissa

  34. ISO #284
    Thread Analyst Timsup2nothin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Where the winds of limbo roar
    Posts
    955
    Community
    Civ Fanatics Center
    Gender
    Hi Lissa. Nice to "meet" you. How do I check in representing CivFanaticsCenter?

  35. ISO #285
    vast tonal gap Lissa's Avatar Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    48,888
    Timezone
    UTC-07:00
    Community
    Ultimate Mafia / Mafia Universe
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Timsup2nothin (#284)
    Hi Lissa. Nice to "meet" you. How do I check in representing CivFanaticsCenter?
    Hi!

    You can check in here: https://www.mafiauniverse.com/forums...al-Information

    I'll send you the information for representatives!

  36. ISO #286
    Can we play DDR instead

  37. ISO #287
    Thread Analyst Exalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Chicago, IL but currently in Istanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    308
    Community
    SSCU Trenchwars Forums
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Just personal preference maybe, but non-themed, known setup games with very few PRs are not only a snooze-fest, but they take a lot of skill out of the equation too. Mafia skill isnt just about blind reads. That plays an obvious part, but part of the skill in being scum in more advanced setups is making your own believable fake claim, or deciding what to do with the limited (or no) info on what the town PRs are. Part of the fun and skill of town in advanced setups is figuring out the setup too.

    Removing those things actually limits skill in my view, and it's a main reason why this type of setup is usually only found in Newbie games on most dedicated mafia sites.

    Yes, there is RNG in what role you get in role madness games, but that's also part of playing mafia. It takes skill to win with a subpar/$#@!ty role and skill to not lose the game with a good one. Even bad situations can be salvaged by good players, and that's the only real way to separate people imo. Putting a bunch of VTs against a couple goons in a known setup is as basic as it gets and limits the plays people can make. I personally dont like it much.

  38. ISO #288

  39. ISO #289
    Ruler of the Universe Thingyman's Avatar Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    9,139
    Community
    PokerNet / 2+2
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Exalt (#287)
    Just personal preference maybe, but non-themed, known setup games with very few PRs are not only a snooze-fest, but they take a lot of skill out of the equation too. Mafia skill isnt just about blind reads. That plays an obvious part, but part of the skill in being scum in more advanced setups is making your own believable fake claim, or deciding what to do with the limited (or no) info on what the town PRs are. Part of the fun and skill of town in advanced setups is figuring out the setup too.

    Removing those things actually limits skill in my view, and it's a main reason why this type of setup is usually only found in Newbie games on most dedicated mafia sites.

    Yes, there is RNG in what role you get in role madness games, but that's also part of playing mafia. It takes skill to win with a subpar/$#@!ty role and skill to not lose the game with a good one. Even bad situations can be salvaged by good players, and that's the only real way to separate people imo. Putting a bunch of VTs against a couple goons in a known setup is as basic as it gets and limits the plays people can make. I personally dont like it much.
    Interesting perspective, and I see where you're coming from.

    I guess mostly I think there are skilled games to be had both with and without PR's. Just different skillsets at play :P

    But I do relate especially to the part about the difficulty of faking claims as a scum in a PR-heavy game. I know that my proudest accomplishment ever having played mafia was winning as mafia vs. 16 townies in a game that not only had lots of PR's, but also a lot of mechanics and events that every single day rewarded the townies with more powers. It was super difficult to navigate in that and I spent probably 3-4 hours every night planning how to best use my own abilities and the in-game reward system etc., so that I was both advancing my win condition and also playing a believable town game. It definitely added an extra dimension to the game, and I can see why most players would find that to be one of the more exciting parts of the game.

    But I guess I don't totally agree with saying "mafia isn't just about blind reads", as in, mafia was at its core developed to be a non-role-heavy game, and what it's become since then is whatever those playing it want it to become. So essentially, there are many ways to play mafia, and I personally appreciate them all :P
    Last edited by Thingyman; April 25th, 2020 at 07:24 PM.

  40. ISO #290
    Thread Analyst Exalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Chicago, IL but currently in Istanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    308
    Community
    SSCU Trenchwars Forums
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Thingyman (#289)
    Quote Originally Posted by Exalt (#287)
    Just personal preference maybe, but non-themed, known setup games with very few PRs are not only a snooze-fest, but they take a lot of skill out of the equation too. Mafia skill isnt just about blind reads. That plays an obvious part, but part of the skill in being scum in more advanced setups is making your own believable fake claim, or deciding what to do with the limited (or no) info on what the town PRs are. Part of the fun and skill of town in advanced setups is figuring out the setup too.

    Removing those things actually limits skill in my view, and it's a main reason why this type of setup is usually only found in Newbie games on most dedicated mafia sites.

    Yes, there is RNG in what role you get in role madness games, but that's also part of playing mafia. It takes skill to win with a subpar/$#@!ty role and skill to not lose the game with a good one. Even bad situations can be salvaged by good players, and that's the only real way to separate people imo. Putting a bunch of VTs against a couple goons in a known setup is as basic as it gets and limits the plays people can make. I personally dont like it much.
    Interesting perspective, and I see where you're coming from.

    I guess mostly I think there are skilled games to be had both with and without PR's. Just different skillsets at play :P

    But I do relate especially to the part about the difficulty of faking claims as a scum in a PR-heavy game. I know that my proudest accomplishment ever having played mafia was winning as mafia vs. 16 townies in a game that not only had lots of PR's, but also a lot of mechanics and events that every single day rewarded the townies with more powers. It was super difficult to navigate in that and I spent probably 3-4 hours every night planning how to best use my own abilities and the in-game reward system etc., so that I was both advancing my win condition and also playing a believable town game. It definitely added an extra dimension to the game, and I can see why most players would find that to be one of the more exciting parts of the game.

    But I guess I don't totally agree with saying "mafia isn't just about blind reads", as in, mafia was at its core developed to be a non-role-heavy game, and what it's become since then is whatever those playing it want it to become. So essentially, there are many ways to play mafia, and I personally appreciate them all :P
    I agree with you that they are different skillsets. I just think mafia has evolved past what it was originally, and to me, removing many of those evolutions is a bit like removing the 3 point line and slam dunks from basketball. Neither of those things existed during the first iteration of the rules, but I think most would agree that the game is better for its evolution. It added skills to the equation, while not necessarily taking away or diminishing the original ones. Also, not everyone is good at every aspect. There are 3-point specialists who can't dunk, and dunking champions who cant hit a 3 pointer. Shaq couldn't even hit a free throw half the time. He was still a great player. He may not have been considered one if the rules never evolved to include dunks though.

    Maybe that's a bit of a ridiculous comparison, but I think it illustrates my point. It's just my opinion anyway.

  41. ISO #291
    Thread Analyst orangeandblack5's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2017
    Location
    University of Michigan
    Posts
    989
    Timezone
    UTC-05:00
    Community
    Liar's Club
    Gender
    It's worth noting that you can't have a championship where each game has different rules, so closed games are already entirely impossible, completely negating any idea of "figuring out the setup".

    Personally, I'd argue that a championship designed around Mafia should focus more on the core aspects of Mafia than mechanical extras that have been added in for extra fun factor over time, but I also believe that the champs should have a diverse range of setups from year to year, if if you go look at the Mad17 setup that ran last year you can see that they are trying to do just that.

    So if this year's game isn't your cup of tea, then maybe check in for Season 8 or 9 and see if it's something more to your liking.

  42. ISO #292
    I think a Role Madness setup might be a good idea -- for a future tournament. There are, as I see it, three main problems:

    1) Any Role Madness setup would have to be the same for all games -- this cuts away a core appeal of the concept. It would not be possible to have a closed setup unless every game had a different setup, which would be especially hard because:

    2) Any Role Madness setup would need an extensive balance check. Any setup that's going to be played a dozen times for tournament needs a lot of scrutiny, especially because all the best strategies will get worked out by the crowd in advance. This ends up being a conceptual problem, because:

    3) Most roles and setups are not suitable to an open setup large crowd. Cop tends to unbalance large setups just by existing, Vigilante is very swingy and inherently unsuitable for tournament play. Framed that way I think it becomes a bit of a new task to make an open or semi-open tournament setup that would be suitable.

    I have some ideas about how to solve these problems, which I might outline in a follow-up if anyone is interested. I think once you solve the conceptual question about what the setup should look like it becomes mostly a matter of testing and balance.

  43. ISO #293
    Soul Reader OrangeP47's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    2,203
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Community
    W3D Hub
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by orangeandblack5 (#291)
    It's worth noting that you can't have a championship where each game has different rules, so closed games are already entirely impossible, completely negating any idea of "figuring out the setup".

    Personally, I'd argue that a championship designed around Mafia should focus more on the core aspects of Mafia than mechanical extras that have been added in for extra fun factor over time, but I also believe that the champs should have a diverse range of setups from year to year, if if you go look at the Mad17 setup that ran last year you can see that they are trying to do just that.

    So if this year's game isn't your cup of tea, then maybe check in for Season 8 or 9 and see if it's something more to your liking.
    I'm going to broadly echo the other Orange's main point here. Full disclosure, I'm a mafia player that generally only plays role madness. It's like 95% of what my home forum does. That said, last season the champs here were role madness, so I'm fine with this season *not* being role madness. If we could just swap every other year back and forth, IMO, that'd be the ideal world.

  44. ISO #294
    Thread Analyst Exalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Chicago, IL but currently in Istanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    308
    Community
    SSCU Trenchwars Forums
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Phoenicks (#292)
    I think a Role Madness setup might be a good idea -- for a future tournament. There are, as I see it, three main problems:

    1) Any Role Madness setup would have to be the same for all games -- this cuts away a core appeal of the concept. It would not be possible to have a closed setup unless every game had a different setup, which would be especially hard because:

    2) Any Role Madness setup would need an extensive balance check. Any setup that's going to be played a dozen times for tournament needs a lot of scrutiny, especially because all the best strategies will get worked out by the crowd in advance. This ends up being a conceptual problem, because:

    3) Most roles and setups are not suitable to an open setup large crowd. Cop tends to unbalance large setups just by existing, Vigilante is very swingy and inherently unsuitable for tournament play. Framed that way I think it becomes a bit of a new task to make an open or semi-open tournament setup that would be suitable.

    I have some ideas about how to solve these problems, which I might outline in a follow-up if anyone is interested. I think once you solve the conceptual question about what the setup should look like it becomes mostly a matter of testing and balance.
    1. Agreed, though is it necessary to do so for each round of the tournament? Round 1 games could have one setup, round 2 another. Instead of having it an open setup, perhaps it could be one of 5 possible setups, with nobody knowing which is which. You could say this makes it more rng, but in many standardized tests in the real world, almost all have alternating versions to prevent cheating. Nobody bats an eye at that. Also, being adaptable to different situations seems like something that should be encouraged.

    2. True, although I'm not sure role madness mafia can ever be completely balanced, but neither can mountainous. Player ability in each role alone can wildly swing games, but since this tournament is about individuals in the first place, I dont really see an issue with it. A degree of luck is always involved too. For instance, anyone that gets perpetually NKed on N1 will always be screwed by voters, no matter what you do. That's not balanced either, yet it's something everyone accepts.

    3. Yes, some PRs massively swing games. That's why you have modifiers to help solve that issue. Instead of a Vanilla cop, maybe you make it an X-shot. Maybe you even make multiple, with one naive or paranoid or something. Theres a lot more you can do in role madness to balance things out than you can in mountainous. Modifiers help balance role madness setups more than anything else in my experience.

    Now, the question is, are games that 'advanced' (relatively speaking) suitable for all communities? Idk, but I'd think if communities are sending their best, then those people can learn if certain roles are unfamiliar to them.

    Also, I'll be playing in this year's setup, but my personal enjoyment level wont be nearly as high as it could be. Some people do love mountainous games and deserve to have those represented, but I'll never understand them. Some people love vanilla ice cream with nothing added too, but I'd rather be able try all the flavors I can. To each their own I guess.

  45. ISO #295
    Having different setups at different stages is an interesting idea. Logistically that would still require more devtime than having one standard setup, and it would lead to some uneven tournaments. Could work if the very last game, the Championship Finals, was the only one with a special setup. In those circumstances you could actually have a closed setup -- since it would only be used one time. Then the main problem would be getting enough eyes to make sure it was balanced, not any problem with the format itself.

    I like your metaphors about three-point lines and standardized tests. It's a good point -- we tend to think of mafia without always considering how it's changed.

    From a practical standpoint, I still don't think even a Role Madness setup should be too complicated. If we're catering to a range of players who would be bored with too little variety, I think too much would also be overwhelming for many. There's probably a balance here somewhere between full vanilla and the wide panoply of possible flavors. Besides, complex setups for sizes of more than a dozen take a lot of time and thought.

  46. ISO #296
    Ruler of the Universe Thingyman's Avatar Administrator
    Join Date
    May 2015
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    9,139
    Community
    PokerNet / 2+2
    Gender
    It could be an idea to do one season where the setup changed from the qualifiers to the semi finals to the finals. So that was the concept and idea for that season.

    But I wouldn't want to make it a permanent thing. Because as a general rule, I think we do better by not half pleasing everyone and instead fully pleasing some segments/communities every year, and then switching it up the next year so that other communities/segments are pleased. That's been the idea, at least, so far.

  47. ISO #297
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    I consider my games to be an unintentional, ongoing, longitudinal study on the feasability of using an open role madness setup with Insta-Snipe anticlaim for a Mafia Universe Championship series someday.
    Last edited by Zork; April 26th, 2020 at 12:48 PM.

  48. ISO #298
    Loansharking blot test Newcomb's Avatar Head Moderator
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    4,197
    Community
    DLP
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Exalt (#287)
    Just personal preference maybe, but non-themed, known setup games with very few PRs are not only a snooze-fest, but they take a lot of skill out of the equation too. Mafia skill isnt just about blind reads. That plays an obvious part, but part of the skill in being scum in more advanced setups is making your own believable fake claim, or deciding what to do with the limited (or no) info on what the town PRs are. Part of the fun and skill of town in advanced setups is figuring out the setup too.

    Removing those things actually limits skill in my view, and it's a main reason why this type of setup is usually only found in Newbie games on most dedicated mafia sites.

    Yes, there is RNG in what role you get in role madness games, but that's also part of playing mafia. It takes skill to win with a subpar/$#@!ty role and skill to not lose the game with a good one. Even bad situations can be salvaged by good players, and that's the only real way to separate people imo. Putting a bunch of VTs against a couple goons in a known setup is as basic as it gets and limits the plays people can make. I personally dont like it much.

  49. ISO #299
    Thread Analyst Exalt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Chicago, IL but currently in Istanbul, Turkey
    Posts
    308
    Community
    SSCU Trenchwars Forums
    Pronouns
    he/him/his/his/himself
    Gender
    Quote Originally Posted by Newcomb (#298)
    Quote Originally Posted by Exalt (#287)
    Just personal preference maybe, but non-themed, known setup games with very few PRs are not only a snooze-fest, but they take a lot of skill out of the equation too. Mafia skill isnt just about blind reads. That plays an obvious part, but part of the skill in being scum in more advanced setups is making your own believable fake claim, or deciding what to do with the limited (or no) info on what the town PRs are. Part of the fun and skill of town in advanced setups is figuring out the setup too.

    Removing those things actually limits skill in my view, and it's a main reason why this type of setup is usually only found in Newbie games on most dedicated mafia sites.

    Yes, there is RNG in what role you get in role madness games, but that's also part of playing mafia. It takes skill to win with a subpar/$#@!ty role and skill to not lose the game with a good one. Even bad situations can be salvaged by good players, and that's the only real way to separate people imo. Putting a bunch of VTs against a couple goons in a known setup is as basic as it gets and limits the plays people can make. I personally dont like it much.

  50. ISO #300
    GOAT Tier Zork's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Posts
    10,561
    Timezone
    UTC-06:00
    Gender
    It is about blind reads, but not exclusively so.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  

Keyboard Shortcuts

about us
Mafia Universe is a community hub for people who enjoy playing the forum variant of Mafia (also known as Werewolf). We offer fully automated Mafia games and a wide variety of customized features crafted to optimize your game experience. We also proudly host the Internet's only database of Mafia/Werewolf communities.

We hope you stick around!
Role of the Day
Bus Driver

The Bus Driver may each night target two players and switch them, causing any actions directed at one to be used on the other instead.